

Happlicant vs Loxo: Which software is best?
Is Happlicant a good alternative to Loxo? We've compared both platforms to help you decide which is right for you.
CRM overall score
95%
ATS overall score
98%
Candidate sourcing score
90%
-Quick takeaway
Is Happlicant a good alternative to Loxo?
Loxo is a strong CRM for recruiters with solid sourcing features and AI tools, but many solo recruiters find it overwhelming or overpriced for what they actually use day-to-day.
As Loxo is targeting all recruiters (in-house and independents), solo recruiters and small agencies find there are features they will never use but ultimately end up paying for.
Happlicant takes a different approach—keeping things simple, personal, and actually built around how independent recruiters work. You won’t find a cluttered UI or endless enterprise features you’ll never touch. Instead, you’ll find thoughtful automations, seamless client interactions, and a clean ATS/CRM.
Given Happlicant doesn't charge per user, it's perfect for smaller, growing staffing firms that need a powerful yet affordable solution.
-Overview
What is Loxo and is Happlicant a good alternative?
Loxo is a cloud-based Talent Intelligence Platform combining ATS and CRM with sourcing, outreach, and AI capabilities.
It includes AI-driven sourcing (Loxo Source), campaign sequencing (Loxo Outreach), and an AI assistant to improve recruiter efficiency.
According to Loxo’s site, “125,000 recruiters around the world choose Loxo, with users ranging from large agencies to smaller in-house talent acquisition teams.
Boasting a wide range of features, it offers advanced tools like Agentic AI and AI-assisted candidate sourcing and outreach features natively.
However, its strength—the wide-ranging functionality—often translates into complexity, slower performance, and high cost.
Solo recruiters and small teams frequently report steep learning curves, cluttered UI, and expensive tiers starting at $109/user/month.
-Look & feel
What is Loxo's user interface like?
How does Loxo platform look and feel compared to Happlicant's?


Loxo: A robust yet over-engineered ATS for big recruiters—maybe too much for solo recruiters and small agencies?
-Who's it for?
Who are Happlicant and Loxo designed for?
What type of recruiters typically uses each software?

Loxo primarily targets staffing agencies and internal recruiting teams ranging from mid-size to enterprise.
While solo recruiters and small agencies can use it (thanks to its inclusive free tier), many find it optimized for multi-user, high-volume environments.
The platform’s wide customization and deep CRM-heavy features often feel like overkill—slow load times and complex workflows burden recruiters who prefer simplicity.
With its steep learning curve and convoluted interface, Loxo may deter solo recruiters who need to onboard quickly and get to work without friction.

Happlicant is purpose-built for solo recruiters and small recruitment agencies who want powerful tools without the overhead of bloated enterprise software.
Unlike traditional platforms designed for large teams, Happlicant strips away the complexity and clutter to focus on the workflows that actually matter to independent recruiters—fast sourcing, client collaboration, candidate tracking, and easy automation.
With modern UX, lightweight setup, and relevant features, Happlicant offers the perfect balance of power and simplicity for recruiters who need tools that work with them, not against them.
-Why Happlicant?
3 key reasons to choose Happlicant over Loxo
What are the most common reasons Happlicant's customers switch from Loxo to Happlicant?
Designed for solo & small teams:
Happlicant delivers CRM + ATS simplicity and speed with zero excess complexity. The platform is perfect for one-person recruiters and lean staffing firms who don't want to pay for features they will never need nor use.
Customer support & onboarding
Many describe Loxo’s support as slow or generic. With its focus on larger clients, solo recruiters often struggle to receive timely, personalized help—a contrast to Happlicant’s dedicated support approach.
Happlicant is more affordable than Loxo
While Loxo charges $109–$300+ per user each month, Happlicant offers a fixed total price that doesn’t scale up as you grow—no hidden costs, no surprise billing, no per‑seat premium!
-Feature-by-feature comparison
Full comparison between Happlicant and Loxo
Analyzing features side by side, which is the best CRM for independent recruiters?
Feature | Happlicant | Bullhorn |
---|---|---|
CRM + ATS in one | ✅ | ✅ |
Chrome sourcing extension | ✅ | ✅ |
Fast, accurate & well structured resume parsing | ✅ | ⚠️ (parsing issues reported) |
AI resume auto reformatter | ✅ | ❌ |
Advanced filtering & intuitive search | ✅ | ✅ |
Modern user interface | ✅ | ⚠️ (cluttered, dated) |
Custom fields & workflows | ✅ | ✅ |
Reporting & analytics dashboards | ✅ | ✅ |
Integrated client portals | ✅ | ✅ |
Email sync + mass outreach | 🚧 (Coming soon!) | ✅ |
Affordable, group-bundled pricing | ✅ | ❌ |
Tailor the software to your needs | ✅ (responsive dev) | ⚠️ (limited) |
Free data migration | ✅ | ❌ |
Want to see Happlicant in action?
Loxo delivers powerful recruiting tools—but its feature-rich setup brings heavy complexity, slower performance, and steeper costs.
Solo recruiters and small teams can struggle with onboarding and maintain overhead that outgrows their day‑to‑day needs.
Happlicant offers the same essential ATS + CRM core, but without clunky UI, expensive per‑user billing, parsing headaches, or slow-loading systems.
👉 See the difference with a free Happlicant demo—experience modern automation, cleaner parsing, and support built for solo recruiters.
-Pricing breakdown
Pricing comparison: Loxo vs. Happlicant
How does Loxo's pricing compare to Happlicant's pricing?
Last reviewed: June 22, 2025

Per-user licensing:
Starter tier: starts at ~$109/user/month
Professional: around $200–300+/user/month
Enterprise: $300+/user/month depending on add-ons
Setup & implementation fees: Unknown, possible fees included.
Add-on costs: integrations, reporting features, or data-sync options may incur extra fees.
Free trial: none clearly advertised; setup may require consultation.
Consult Loxo's website for more info.
Estimated Loxo pricing:
Min: $109+/user/month
Max: $300+/user/month

2 tiers:
1-3 users: $45/month per month for up to 3 users
4+ users: $150/month
Prices including a 55% launch discount!
IMPORTANT: These are total prices, not per user, like most other providers.
Flexibility perks: No long-term contracts, pausable/cancelable anytime, and free credit-card-free trial
Free trial: 14-day free trial
Happlicant pricing:
1-3 users: $45/mo (total price)
4+ users $150/mo (unlimited users)
Why pay for extra seats?!
At Happlicant, we understand that sometimes independent recruiters need to take on contractors for time to time. You should have to pay more for your software!
We don't charge you more for an extra pair of hands.
"Happlicant has been a breath of fresh air, it's easy to navigate and flexible enough to adapt certain features that best represent my recruitment style and workflow. Everything feels intentional and recruiter-focused. The support team is responsive, they schedule regular check-ins and are genuinely open to feedback, which makes a huge difference. It feels like it’s built with us, not just for us."
-Leigh W.
-Customer support
Review of Loxo's customer support
What do people say about the customer support & onboarding of Loxo vs. Happlicant?

Experiences vary. Some agencies appreciate Loxo’s robust onboarding, but many solo recruiters report slow ticket responses and generic bot/email only support. Tyron B. mentions "when it comes to customer support, I give them one star. Their support model is e-mail only, and it always takes several days to get help or have an issue resolved." g2.com
One user said "Customer support - My customer success manager ignores most messages or issues." Capterra.com
Reviewers mention issues such as poor responsiveness and billing mistakes, adding friction for smaller users. One user noted that feature requests were not prioritized for smaller clients, leading to delayed fixes.
By contrast, Happlicant’s client-first model ensures fast, personalized help tailored to independent recruiters.

Happlicant doesn’t just give you software—we give you real support and real results. Whether you need us to handle the data migration, you're stuck on setup, or just want a second opinion on how to do something, you’ll get fast, thoughtful help.
Because we specialize in solo recruiters and small agencies, you really matter to us. There’s no generic ticketing abyss or outsourced chatbot loop—support is led by people who care deeply about your experience.
Most questions are answered the same day, and customers regularly mention how the team goes above and beyond with proactive ideas, hands-on help, and zero ego.
We want you to feel like you have a partner, not just a vendor.
-Customer reviews
Loxo customers' feedback & online reviews
See what Loxo customers are saying about its strengths & gaps:

Despite its rich feature set, many users have flagged gaps and weaknesses in Loxo’s platform. Key critiques include:
Interface & Performance:
Some recruiters find Loxo’s UI cluttered or slightly outdated. For example, one user noted the interface “can act a little dated” and would benefit from visual updates g2.com. Occasional performance hitches are reported – e.g. long load times or freezes during contact imports g2.com.
Workflow Constraints:
A few workflow limitations frustrate users. Notably, Loxo only lets users submit candidates via the Jobs module; there’s no option to submit directly from a candidate’s profile g2.com. Recruiters also request more flexibility in customizing the pipeline: for instance, client portal branding and report layouts are hard to change. One reviewer wished for better branding customization and more flexible reporting layouts g2.com. An expert review similarly noted “limited customization options in reporting tools” as a con research.com.
Integrations & Data Quality:
Loxo’s ecosystem is more closed than some competitors. It does not integrate with LinkedIn Recruiter, forcing users to manage a separate LinkedIn workflow capterra.com. Integrations with popular tools (e.g. Apollo, certain phone/VOIP systems) are limited g2.com. Even built-in sourcing has issues: one recruiter called Loxo a “jack of all trades, master of none,” reporting that Loxo’s sourcing engine often returns outdated contact info (he frequently had to verify candidates on LinkedIn) reddit.com.
Email & Outreach Issues:
While Loxo has robust outreach tools, users report occasional glitches. Some emails sent through Loxo end up in spam folders (notably with Gmail recipients) g2.com. Others wish for richer email formatting – for example, the ability to create newsletter-style emails capterra.com. Additionally, the SMS/texting feature only works on desktop; users say they “use the text feature all day” but can’t do it when away from their desk softwareadvice.com.
Mobile Access:
Loxo lacks a full mobile app. Reviewers report the mobile web view is very basic (essentially a read-only lookup), which limits recruiting on-the-go capterra.com.
Customization & Missing Features:
A few advanced needs go unmet. For example, Loxo does not allow formatting resumes (CVs) within the system before sending to clients capterra.com. Some users note that requested features (or third-party integrations) have not yet been added; others mention that recent updates have sometimes broken existing workflows g2.com. These suggest that while Loxo is rapidly evolving, not all user feedback translates into new features.
-Happlicant's customers
What are recruiters saying about Happlicant?
-Overview
FAQs: Happlicant vs. Loxo
How does Happlicant charge users?
Unlike Loxo’s escalating per‑user pricing, Happlicant uses a flat rate—$45 total for up to 3 users, and $150 for 4+. No surprises as you grow.
Is there a long contract with Happlicant?
Nope. Happlicant is month-to-month. Cancel or pause anytime—no lock-in, no surprises.
Can I easily export my Happlicant data if I decide to leave?
Absolutely—just ask. We’ll export everything for you in a clean, structured format. While we'll be very sad to see you leave, we won't make it hard for you.
How easy is it to get started with Happlicant compared to Loxo?
Happlicant gets you up and running in minutes—no sales hoops or weeks of onboarding. And our team is ready to support anytime.
Can I migrate from Loxo to Happlicant?
Yes! We offer free white-glove migration from Loxo, including candidate records, client data, and resume extraction.
Which platform updates more often—Happlicant or Loxo?
Happlicant launches user-driven updates weekly. Loxo’s roadmap may feel slower and less responsive, especially to solo recruiters and smaller agencies.
Disclaimer: All the data found in this review is based on research from Loxo's website, popular review sites and interviews with prior customers. Last updated: June 22, 2025.
-Features